Introduction
Due
to circumstances beyond my control, I began my ILA with a Year 5 class
inquiring about geography and moved to a Year 9 class inquiring about the
Industrial Revolution in History. This impacted slightly on how and when data
was gathered. I moved from an inquiry in which I was working collaboratively
with the teacher and students, to an inquiry where I was mainly an observer of
the process.
The
second ILA was part of a 7 week unit and unfortunately, the teacher and I only
became involved during the research assessment stage of the unit. Throughout
the inquiry process of the research assignment, each student was given access
to laptops for 3 x 60 minutes per week for three weeks. The students had to
rely on the Internet, as the school had very limited hard copy resources for
the students to access. Teacher assistance and feedback was provided as and
when required. The students were required to present their research in a
multimodal presentation.
With
my first ILA, the teacher and I were “tuning” the students into the topic and
the data gathered was from the first exposure to the inquiry. Unfortunately, I
missed this stage of the second ILA.
METHOD
During
these inquiries, I used several methods to acquire data. The major data
gathering device used was Todd’s, Kuhlthau’s & Heinstrom’s (2005) SLIM
toolkit. This provided me with reflection
sheets to distribute to the students. During my first ILA, I was able to gather
data from the first reflection sheet. Due to a time factor impacting on the
second ILA, I decided to issue only two reflections one and three. Other data
was gathered from observations during the ILAs, and discussions with students
and teachers. These observations and discussions provided an informal insight
into how the students were engaging with the inquiry activity and assisted in
identifying areas where additional support was required.
I
elected to use the SLIM toolkit as it had been designed to assess student
learning through guided inquiry and had been developed by specialists in the
field. It provided a methodical approach to data gathering and analysis, as
opposed to the more subjective approaches of observation and discussion.
During
the first ILA, Reflection Sheet 1 was administered to the students at the
beginning of the inquiry unit. The students reflected on the five questions
relating to their knowledge and experiences. During the second ILA, Reflection
Sheet 1 was administered on my first day with the class, however the students
had already participated in several class sessions introducing the topic.
Reflection Sheet 3 was administered at the end of the inquiry when the students
had completed their research and were presenting their findings.
REFERENCES
Todd, R,
Kuhlthau, C & Heinstrom, J. 2005. 'Impact Studies', Rutgers School of
Communication and Information, Accessed 19th September 2013, Source: from http://cissl.rutgers.edu/joomla-license/impact-studies?start=6
No comments:
Post a Comment